In current global economic shifts, we must consider how we can situate ourselves within a reconstructed economic relationship. No longer can we just think within our physical boundaries, but instead we must consider how our actions will affect the global community’s future. We must think “whatever we do today, how will it affect tomorrow’s global community?”
How can our global community, and corporate establish a methodological framework that will empower both? How can corporate involve and benefit from its community? In order to allow community participation, how can corporate create community self-empowerment tools? A primary answer to such inquiries would be the methodological framework of sociospiritualism, which links responsibility to consciousness. It would allow communities to become more involved in corporate experiences. Thus, it enhances consideration of affective approaches to achieving the goals and objectives for all parties involved. Sociospiritualism would allow corporate to consider how their natural and business resources affect community.
This framework would foster greater concern regarding the socioeconomic, ecological, and political issues surrounding the BP oil situation. It would also enhance the focus upon the Haiti rescue of a nation.
Community economic and somatic sustainability must afford a balance within this theoretical construct. We can not maintain our level of complacency and create temporary action. We must stay committed to completion. Without such forms of conscious development, we will continue to tip ecological, economic, and political balances.
